INJUSTICE AT WORK

INJUSTICE AT WORK

Share this post

INJUSTICE AT WORK
INJUSTICE AT WORK
Iowa Supreme Court Says Sex And Gender Identity Discrimination Are Different

Iowa Supreme Court Says Sex And Gender Identity Discrimination Are Different

Court rejects U.S. Supreme Ct analysis in landmark case, Bostock v. Clayton County.

Patricia G. Barnes, J.D.
Apr 08, 2022
∙ Paid

Share this post

INJUSTICE AT WORK
INJUSTICE AT WORK
Iowa Supreme Court Says Sex And Gender Identity Discrimination Are Different
Share

The Court noted Iowa’s civil rights law provides separate protections based on gender identity and sex. Even though its state statute must be read broadly, the Court said the “ordinary meaning” of sex does not include “gender identity.”

“We may not through the judicial metamorphosis of words declare a Hulk where the legislature placed merely Bruce Banner,” writes the Court.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to INJUSTICE AT WORK to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Patricia G. Barnes
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share