INJUSTICE AT WORK

INJUSTICE AT WORK

Share this post

INJUSTICE AT WORK
INJUSTICE AT WORK
Explosion Of Porn Since U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Invoked In Balenciaga Ad Campaign
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Explosion Of Porn Since U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Invoked In Balenciaga Ad Campaign

The Court in 2002 sided 6-3 with the adult entertainment industry and rejected parts of The Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 as overbroad and vague.

Patricia G. Barnes, J.D.
Nov 28, 2022
∙ Paid

Share this post

INJUSTICE AT WORK
INJUSTICE AT WORK
Explosion Of Porn Since U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Invoked In Balenciaga Ad Campaign
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

Ed. Note: This story was written on Nov. 28 and reflects other reporting and a visible reference to the defendant in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition in the opinion. However, The New York Times reported Dec. 1 that the document in the Balenciaga ad campaign was U.S. v. Williams and it was displayed in a separate 2022 Balenciaga ad. The Ashcroft decisi…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to INJUSTICE AT WORK to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Patricia G. Barnes
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More